I Say Again
I begun this as
a comment for Facebook but have changed my mind because of its size. I’m sure
that, over time, I have said these things before; but, in light of comments I,
from time to time, continue to hear from others, I say again.
You can say this
either way. The Social Security Fund invested its surplus funds in the United
States Government by buying government securities for which they receive
interest; or, you can say, the government of the United States borrowed the
Social Security surplus collections, securing them with interest bearing notes
or securities. Either way, the government did not steal the Social Security
fund's money. Their investments will receive interest and be repaid when due as is
every other government security. Surely one would not expect the fund to invest
in lesser secure investments. As bad off as we may seem, no other institution
in the world has better credit than the United States of America. Ours is the
reserve currency of the world. That very well may change; but, for now, that’s
just the way it is.
You are
absolutely right, Beth. The Social Security fund is not part of our national
budget. Neither does it in any way affect our deficit or our debt unless you
want to consider the fact that it is a creditor.Social Security is a stand-alone fund.
Last, but
certainly not least, the Social Security fund is not going broke. Those who say
different are mistaken. Yes, in a few years, the
income to the fund will need to be adjusted as will all our budget plans as
conditions change. We should have already done so except for those in Congress
who lack the political courage to step up and take care of business where and
when it is needed—their own personal interests taking precedent over those of our
nation. Of course, other reasons are due to their political chess games—also
not in the best interest of the nation.
Yes we have a
huge national debt. It shouldn’t be. But it is; and you can blame almost all of
it on the Republicans—their personal greed and their political games of chess.
If they can bring us to the brink of bankruptcy, they can force us to get rid
of Social Security, Health Care, and other safety net programs. Yes. They are
coming after our Social Security. They have told us as much.
When Jimmy
Carter left office, our national debt was less than one trillion dollars. That
is as close to zero as any of us is going to see in our lifetimes. When George
W left office, our national debt was around ten trillion dollars, an increase
of 1,004%; and, on top of that, he left us on the edge of a global financial
crisis and one of the potentially
deepest depressions in world history—that after inheriting a nice and
comfortable budget surplus from our DINO president William Jefferson Clinton.
You remember him. Think NAFTA. Think the repeal of Glass–Steagall which, among
other causes, led to the financial crisis. Think etc. but I digress. The fact
is, we wouldn’t have had most of the additional debt leading up to the eighteen
trillion dollars we have now if Bush would have kept us on track with the
spending level he inherited.
But I want to
tell you something else. Our country isn’t broke either, unless we choose to continue
in that direction. There is enough gross domestic product produced in this
nation every year to pay off our debt over a reasonable period of time and
still have the other programs we need for the welfare and security of our
nation and our people. It will require that our people be paid fair and reasonable
living wages and that everybody pays their fair share of taxes, including top
wage earners and corporations, It would also help immensely if our Department of Defense and intelligence agencies were to implement auditable accounting systems with integrated data bases and fair pricing. Certainly, fair and more reliant pricing by our defense contractors would contribute. Cost overruns range from the sublime to the ridiculous. We can do this if we really want. If we want to continue as
the leader of the free world, we must.
In the mean
time, this is Ronald Miller, www.sageobserver.blogspot.com,
signing off. Email me at mtss86@comcast.net.
Yes it is true that the Social Security funds are intact in the the books.
ReplyDeleteReality is that the US government spent the funds already and has no means of securing the money to pay it back.
Yes they could print the money but then that money would not buy a thing.
The short term illusion is far removed from the long term reality.