Translate

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Where Do We Go From Here?–Part 4

          Wednesday, April 2nd, yesterday, our Supreme Court of the United States of America, the last bastion of defense provided to us by our Founding Fathers through our Constitution for the defense of our democracy from tyranny, once again failed the American people. With a final vote of 5 to 4, they lifted the ban on aggregate campaign contributions (Ref. McCutcheon v. Federal Elections Commission). They once again collaborated in the grand theft of our voting power, once more robbing from the poor and giving to the rich and powerful Corporatocracy and Power Elite who now governs our nation from behind the scenes, or under the table, whichever you choose to reference. I have been referring to these people as our Shadow Government. Obviously, they aren't much of a shadow anymore; and what they do is no longer very secretive. Their actions are more obvious with every passing day.

When I first begun to post this particular series, Where Do We Go From Here, into this blog, I told you we, i.e. our nation, is engaged in a civil war (albeit not a shooting war). This is just one more battle we the people have lost; and, if you don’t believe me now, I don’t know what to tell you when the evidence is so clear. Nothing I say can overturn a decision of our Supreme Court, but I am compelled to comment. This case, McCutcheon v. F.E.C., along with that of Citizens United v. F.E.C. in 2010, was essentially based upon one’s right of freedom of speech. Our Supreme Court believes money is equivalent to free speech. I say to you unequivocally, money is not speech. People talk, folks. Only people talk. Never in my life have I heard a dollar say a word. Money does burn holes in people’s pockets, but it never talks. God made people. People made money. Only people have the right of free speech, our illustrious Supreme Court of the United States of America notwithstanding. Furthermore, when money is deemed equivalent to free speech, our concept of one person, one vote is, as I have said in the past, completely negated. There is no way the votes of our people can outweigh the vast wealth of the rich, especially when the rich are blatantly stealing our money out the back door with impunity. We have discussed on more than one occasion the rapidly increasing disparity in income and wealth between the wealthy and the poor in our nation–worldwide, for that matter.

Neither is this issue the only issue. Our Shadow Government is attacking our vote from another angle–more than one as a matter of fact, ranging from gerrymandering of voting districts, needless requirements for voter I.D.’s, the amendment to the voter rights act in 2006, pole restrictions, and excessive control over voting registrations. An excellent point of reference is the Supreme Court Decision in Bush v. Gore in 2000. We are right around the corner from losing our country, folks. We are under attack. Sleep at your peril.

The next question has to be, “What can we do about it?” Let me tell you. Stand up and do something. Anything! But let your voice be heard! They, our legislative representatives, for the most part, have already sold out to the enemy; but, at the end of the day, when the “rubber meets the road, under the law (until they take that away, too), our elected representatives still need our vote in order to remain in office. In that respect (and in that respect only) they still care about your vote. They need it to stay in office. Stay on top of them constantly. Let them know your objections and objectives as well. If they respond only perfunctorily or fail to respond at all, keep trying. Write them, telephone them, whatever. Also, write letters to the editor of your newspapers. Call into the media, such as C-Span, etc.  Perhaps we need to flood the highways, skyways, and railroads with a one hundred million man march on our nation’s capital. If that’s what you do, warn them in advance to have sufficient supplies of toilet paper and outdoor facilities for your accommodation(s).

There is only one way to recover our voting rights, folks, and keep them. That is to take any and all private money out of politics. We should do this immediately by establishing it in law with legislation; and, subsequently, amending our Constitution accordingly. Anyone  violating this law, upon conviction, should be penalized by imprisonment along with all parties involved. No person, corporation, or any other designated person, organization, immediate family member, relatives, or the candidate themselves should be allowed to contribute money to political campaigns. All elections must be financed through our taxes. In the event you think this would be “just another tax”, don’t worry about it. Do you think you aren't paying that tax now? You bet you are. You are paying every penny of every exorbitant campaign dollar currently being spent. It’s in the price you pay everyday on the market for what you buy, i.e. gas, food, clothing, shelter, heating oil, etc. You surely know these people don’t buy votes for nothing. They get it all back in spades.

Elections are enormously expensive. As you have seen in the news media, our elected representatives spend a significant amount of their time, if not the majority, on the telephone soliciting money in order to finance their campaigns and get re-elected. If they didn’t have to spend so much of their time soliciting money, how much more time would they have to get work done for their constituents?  Before you answer that question, how much more time would they have, if, in addition, they didn’t work such short work weeks, going home Thursdays and coming back to Washington on Monday’s. They say they work when they are home. What would that be–more time soliciting money? If they could spend more time on the job, perhaps, maybe, we would see them in the chambers of the House and Senate during debate time for a change, or at committee hearings (presently, for the most part, their seats are empty). Doesn't the word debate mean or imply that all parties to the debate are present for the process? In order to legislate objectively doesn't the legislator need to understand both sides of the debates? Otherwise, what’s the use of debating, if no one is there to hear? Perhaps our representatives read all the records of every day’s proceedings and don’t need to be present for the vocal arguments. Perhaps they don’t need to debate or be at the hearings. For that matter, perhaps they don’t need to be objective. What do you think? I think that if we take away the need of our representatives to be constantly soliciting money, it would add many hours to their workweek and we would get our tax money back in spades.

We have to take back our country, people. This country is supposed to be a nation of the people, by the people, and for the people; and don’t you understand? We are losing it; and, when it’s gone, you won’t like what’s left. Trust me. You won’t like it one bit, and neither will your children or grandchildren. Liberty is precious. If you don’t fight for it, you will most certainly lose it as there is always someone ready and willing to take it from you. How did we get our country in the first place? It’s in your hands.

Ronald Miller
mtss86@comcast.net

No comments:

Post a Comment