Translate

Friday, April 4, 2014

I Confess

          Over the past many days, weeks, months, even years, I have made some pretty strong criticisms against my government, my elected representatives in that government, and about the Corporatocracy and Power Elite in our country (that word, Corporatocracy kills me. I have to correct the spelling every time I use it. I even almost choke when I must pronounce it.).

I confess. I am prejudiced–very much so. I am deeply prejudiced toward my ingrained belief in an Almighty God who created this earth and the people thereon. I am prejudiced, also, in the deeply held belief that the earth and its resources were His gifts to man, all men–not just the privileged and gifted few among us. I truly believe Jesus when he says, “You cannot worship God and Mammon”. I, also, believe Jesus when he says, “To whom much is given, much is expected in return”. I am prejudiced, too, in the belief in the sovereignty of my country and the right of the people to rule over their inheritance. This earth, this nation, every nation belongs to the people, all the people who inhabit it. Doesn't, in effect, our Declaration of Independence and the Preamble to our Constitution say that?  To this end, all other institutions, institutions of government, those of business, or whatever, created by man, are created for his service, to provide for the fulfillment of man’s needs, just as the creations by God are created to fulfill His needs. Everything I say and everything I propose emanates from those prejudices.

I don’t apologize. That’s me. That's who I am.

Ronald Miller
mtss86@comcast.net

          

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Where Do We Go From Here?–Part 4

          Wednesday, April 2nd, yesterday, our Supreme Court of the United States of America, the last bastion of defense provided to us by our Founding Fathers through our Constitution for the defense of our democracy from tyranny, once again failed the American people. With a final vote of 5 to 4, they lifted the ban on aggregate campaign contributions (Ref. McCutcheon v. Federal Elections Commission). They once again collaborated in the grand theft of our voting power, once more robbing from the poor and giving to the rich and powerful Corporatocracy and Power Elite who now governs our nation from behind the scenes, or under the table, whichever you choose to reference. I have been referring to these people as our Shadow Government. Obviously, they aren't much of a shadow anymore; and what they do is no longer very secretive. Their actions are more obvious with every passing day.

When I first begun to post this particular series, Where Do We Go From Here, into this blog, I told you we, i.e. our nation, is engaged in a civil war (albeit not a shooting war). This is just one more battle we the people have lost; and, if you don’t believe me now, I don’t know what to tell you when the evidence is so clear. Nothing I say can overturn a decision of our Supreme Court, but I am compelled to comment. This case, McCutcheon v. F.E.C., along with that of Citizens United v. F.E.C. in 2010, was essentially based upon one’s right of freedom of speech. Our Supreme Court believes money is equivalent to free speech. I say to you unequivocally, money is not speech. People talk, folks. Only people talk. Never in my life have I heard a dollar say a word. Money does burn holes in people’s pockets, but it never talks. God made people. People made money. Only people have the right of free speech, our illustrious Supreme Court of the United States of America notwithstanding. Furthermore, when money is deemed equivalent to free speech, our concept of one person, one vote is, as I have said in the past, completely negated. There is no way the votes of our people can outweigh the vast wealth of the rich, especially when the rich are blatantly stealing our money out the back door with impunity. We have discussed on more than one occasion the rapidly increasing disparity in income and wealth between the wealthy and the poor in our nation–worldwide, for that matter.

Neither is this issue the only issue. Our Shadow Government is attacking our vote from another angle–more than one as a matter of fact, ranging from gerrymandering of voting districts, needless requirements for voter I.D.’s, the amendment to the voter rights act in 2006, pole restrictions, and excessive control over voting registrations. An excellent point of reference is the Supreme Court Decision in Bush v. Gore in 2000. We are right around the corner from losing our country, folks. We are under attack. Sleep at your peril.

The next question has to be, “What can we do about it?” Let me tell you. Stand up and do something. Anything! But let your voice be heard! They, our legislative representatives, for the most part, have already sold out to the enemy; but, at the end of the day, when the “rubber meets the road, under the law (until they take that away, too), our elected representatives still need our vote in order to remain in office. In that respect (and in that respect only) they still care about your vote. They need it to stay in office. Stay on top of them constantly. Let them know your objections and objectives as well. If they respond only perfunctorily or fail to respond at all, keep trying. Write them, telephone them, whatever. Also, write letters to the editor of your newspapers. Call into the media, such as C-Span, etc.  Perhaps we need to flood the highways, skyways, and railroads with a one hundred million man march on our nation’s capital. If that’s what you do, warn them in advance to have sufficient supplies of toilet paper and outdoor facilities for your accommodation(s).

There is only one way to recover our voting rights, folks, and keep them. That is to take any and all private money out of politics. We should do this immediately by establishing it in law with legislation; and, subsequently, amending our Constitution accordingly. Anyone  violating this law, upon conviction, should be penalized by imprisonment along with all parties involved. No person, corporation, or any other designated person, organization, immediate family member, relatives, or the candidate themselves should be allowed to contribute money to political campaigns. All elections must be financed through our taxes. In the event you think this would be “just another tax”, don’t worry about it. Do you think you aren't paying that tax now? You bet you are. You are paying every penny of every exorbitant campaign dollar currently being spent. It’s in the price you pay everyday on the market for what you buy, i.e. gas, food, clothing, shelter, heating oil, etc. You surely know these people don’t buy votes for nothing. They get it all back in spades.

Elections are enormously expensive. As you have seen in the news media, our elected representatives spend a significant amount of their time, if not the majority, on the telephone soliciting money in order to finance their campaigns and get re-elected. If they didn’t have to spend so much of their time soliciting money, how much more time would they have to get work done for their constituents?  Before you answer that question, how much more time would they have, if, in addition, they didn’t work such short work weeks, going home Thursdays and coming back to Washington on Monday’s. They say they work when they are home. What would that be–more time soliciting money? If they could spend more time on the job, perhaps, maybe, we would see them in the chambers of the House and Senate during debate time for a change, or at committee hearings (presently, for the most part, their seats are empty). Doesn't the word debate mean or imply that all parties to the debate are present for the process? In order to legislate objectively doesn't the legislator need to understand both sides of the debates? Otherwise, what’s the use of debating, if no one is there to hear? Perhaps our representatives read all the records of every day’s proceedings and don’t need to be present for the vocal arguments. Perhaps they don’t need to debate or be at the hearings. For that matter, perhaps they don’t need to be objective. What do you think? I think that if we take away the need of our representatives to be constantly soliciting money, it would add many hours to their workweek and we would get our tax money back in spades.

We have to take back our country, people. This country is supposed to be a nation of the people, by the people, and for the people; and don’t you understand? We are losing it; and, when it’s gone, you won’t like what’s left. Trust me. You won’t like it one bit, and neither will your children or grandchildren. Liberty is precious. If you don’t fight for it, you will most certainly lose it as there is always someone ready and willing to take it from you. How did we get our country in the first place? It’s in your hands.

Ronald Miller
mtss86@comcast.net

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Where Do We Go From Here? Part 3

We have seen throughout history the courses and directions of the far left, i.e. Communism, Socialism, with their ultimate end (When I talk about Communism and Socialism, folks, I’m talking about real “isms”–not about the pejoratives touted by the ignorant and uninformed. Do let us be clear, however. Progressivism is not Socialism. Progressivism is not Communism.). It should and must be obvious we don’t want to follow their paths to self destruction. On the other hand, if we continue on the path advocated by those on the right, that too, will lead us to destruction. Mark my words. We will surely fail. The pudding is in the eating. Don’t let the propaganda fool you. There is no free market. It’s a lie, and gets to be more-so as the years pass. A market is only free as it plays out on a level playing field, completely free of influence or manipulation by the parties concerned. Generally speaking, the only place you will find that, a free market, is in a classroom or textbook–certainly not in the real world. If you believe otherwise, then you must believe, as they tell you, that the world oil market is such a free market, the price of which is the resultant effect of the interactions of supply and demand. Rubbish! Although supply and demand are certainly contributing factors, so also are speculation, price manipulation, and the control of supply through the manipulation of refineries by opening and closing them, holding ships offshore, etc. There is no free market. It is true. Believe it.

Laissez-faire capitalism is defined by Wikipedia, as an economic environment in which transactions between private parties are free from government restrictions, tariffs, and subsidies, with only enough regulations to protect property rights. The words are French which literally means “let [them] do,” but it broadly implies “let it be”, “ let them do as they will,” or “leave it alone”. In effect, that is a free market. Do you really think such a system left to its own devices will work? Do you really think? Just look. We have been deregulating continually since President Carter left office, and it has been a complete failure. This whole economic mess in which we are currently involved is the direct result of the greed, avarice, and downright dishonesty of those who advocate this system, the so-called free market, unregulated and out of control. Although these people were not prosecuted, they were crooks, legal crooks or illegal crooks. Call them what you will. They didn’t care about their country; they didn’t care about people; and they didn’t care about our environment. The only thing they did care about was themselves–their short-term gain; and, in the long run, I don’t think they cared about themselves either. They were certainly smart enough to see what was coming, and they did it anyway (I must note that they are continuing their evil deeds as we speak, denying our efforts toward reform). I do note, however, when the smoke cleared after the crash they came out of this dilemma far better, in general, than most of the rest of us. In general, their losses were minimal. I can come to no other conclusion, Capitalism, left to its own pursuit and devices without regulation and control will self destruct just as surely as those systems on the far left, Communism and Socialism. Only the strongest will survive; and, then, it will be called by a different name–perhaps Fascism, perhaps Nazism, whatever. A rose is a rose by any name. In the end, our Shadow Government will be a shadow no longer. It will be in your face.

Isn't that what has been happening over these many years since the beginnings of the eighties, especially egregious during the administration of George W. Bush, who not only deregulated but, also, purposely neglected to enforce those laws that were on the books. It will take years and maybe something else to redirect our nation on a positive course once again–to get beyond this vicious attack on our country by these people. One thing is certain, though. We will not solve our problem by electing them back into office. They should never be given power again–Ever! Again, let me repeat myself. These people do not care about this country or the people. They care only about themselves and their own personal interests. They have forfeited their right to govern. They have sold us out, and I rebuke the Democrats for not calling them to task for what they have done to us and to our nation.

We no longer live in the eighteenth or nineteenth century. This is the twenty-first century. This is the nuclear age. Our former policy of US vs. them can no longer endure. Our needs now are far and remote from our needs when we begun. Our forefathers were exceedingly intelligent, wise, and thinkers beyond their years; and surely, they must have had the best intent for the long term good of our country in mind; but, they weren’t omniscient; neither were they fortune tellers; and neither were they God–they were human beings, just like us. Many years have passed–almost a quarter of a millennium since our inception as a nation. There is very little, economically or politically that hasn't changed since–very little. We must all surely know that. It is past time for us to quit arguing and come together, to quit living in the past, to reform our law to reflect where we are now and where we will go from here, to think less of ourselves, but rather to think of our country–our great nation. Anarchy can never be; neither can tyranny be accepted by us in any way, shape, or form. We must never allow ourselves to be dominated by anyone–not a person, i.e. a Dictator, and not a group, i.e. an Oligarchy, such as a Corporatocracy, or Power Elite.  We must, also, understand that our freedom ends where that of others begins. We can no longer do as we please, if we are to be free and remain so. And, it is also true that we can no longer govern ourselves as thirteen sovereign nations under a common flag. That the concept of states’ rights must be preserved because of differences in regional needs is a must; but we must, also, accept that to maintain ourselves as a sovereign nation among others, we must be and remain one great nation under God with liberty and justice for all–united we stand, divided we fall. We must have and maintain a strong central government of the people, by the people, and for the people–all the people, all 100% of us–the only group under whose control we should abide. One surely doesn't have to graduate from Harvard or Yale to know that.

If we can’t go right and we can’t go left. Where can we go? Let me suggest. Why can’t we take from the best traits of both? We know that both have many. The best parts of capitalism under proper governance have provided a prosperous standard of living for our people for many years. The best parts of progressivism have done the same with economic security, safety nets, and a road for equal opportunity for all until, unfortunately, its suppression in these latter years.

Some institutions are better operated under privately operated businesses. Others are more efficient and less expensive operated collectively. In fact, our Social Security Administration is one of the most, if not the most efficient institutions in our government as well as one with the lowest administrative costs, their long lines at the windows (a sacrifice of efficiency to reduced costs) notwithstanding. Another example of an institution which would be more efficiently operated with less expense collectively is Healthcare–currently one of the most expensive services of all, now contributing more and more to our national deficit and debt in addition to the bankruptcies of millions of people annually. Many will disagree, especially those who sell insurance and pharmaceuticals, but Healthcare is more adaptive and better provided using a system of collective governance than any privatized application or system of applications can ever accomplish, the Affordable Care Act notwithstanding.

Of course, this is arguable, but one only has to look to our northern neighbor, Canada or England, or some of the European nations. The people there get better healthcare for far less money–a documented fact. I submit to you that a single payer universal healthcare system modeled after Medicare would be an ideal start toward the implementation of a universal healthcare system for our people; and it could be implemented immediately, covering all from the cradle to the grave, just beginning by going to the doctor and having them charge Medicare (Not quite that simple, perhaps, but certainly more so than what we are now experiencing with ACA). Of course there will be necessary tweaks, perhaps many, but there is no fault to be found that can’t be corrected by the pen, either up front or after the fact in legislation. Just look at the billions of dollars, if not trillions, that would be saved over the years, the arguing and bickering which would end, and the time and money saved in litigation and legislating, as well as the positive influence on employers and workweek hours. Admit it. A national healthcare system operated collectively makes a lot of sense–a whole lot. In deciding our direction for the future, our focus point should, and must be, the prosperity and wellbeing of our people–not the profiteers in this nation. Business, as I have said many times before exists for the sole purpose of serving people–not their dominance. When a collective approach is warranted, we should use it. When a private approach is warranted, we should use that.

When Socialism is cried, I don’t want to hear it. Rid your mind of the propaganda and pejoratives of the ignorant. The approach which I am suggesting, is using the best of both Capitalism and Progressivism, a constructive and positive effort toward the improvement of the standard of living and conditions of our people–all our people, the whole 100%. That’s the direction we want to go. That’s the direction in which we should go; and, to this end, we must take back our government for the people. 

Ronald Miller
mtss86@comcast.net