Translate

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Our Sovereignty


If the election in 2016 of Donald Trump to the presidency of our country has proven nothing else, it has been a testimony to the lack of knowledge, in general, and blind loyalty, in particular, of our electorate to party politics—a sad state of affairs surpassed only by its threat to the very sovereignty of our democratic republic.

Recently, I was reading a book, Marbury v. Madison: The Origins and Legacy of Judicial Review by William E. Nelson, published by the University Press of Kansas from which I quote:”Permanently organized political parties, as we now known them, had never been part of British or colonial political ideology during the eighteenth century, and they remained foreign to American political thinking as the nineteenth century began. Leaders of government, it was thought, should act in the interests and for the benefit of the entire citizenry, not just on behalf of those who had voted in their favor.” One should note that the referenced period of time is in our nation’s very beginning. It goes on to say:”One reason Americans distrusted political factions was a fear that they would propel society into chaos and civil strife.” Well how about that—over 200 years ago? Look at us today.

In this case before the Supreme Court, Marbury v Madison, when Chief Justice Marshall “used the doctrine of judicial review to curb partisan excesses and move the nation back toward it’s eighteenth-century tradition of consensus government, most Americans felt relieved….The rationale for judicial review rested upon the unique American conception of sovereignty that had developed during and after the founding era debates. Americans had then rejected the traditional British view that the legislature possessed complete sovereignty, and many had begun to argue instead that sovereignty lay with the people, who by a constitution delegated limited power to the legislature.”

We have come a long way since the Revolutionary War; the sovereignty of our people, if we would just stop and think about it, has come a long way too. Our constitution was written behind closed doors by our founding fathers and then submitted to our elected representatives. And who elected them? In general, only white men who owned property and paid taxes—the elite, about 7% of the population. Today, eligibility to vote in our nation is established both through our constitution and by state law. I think it is fair to say that most all of us today can vote if we are a citizen, including women— race, creed, or color notwithstanding.

And what are we doing with this wonderful privilege which is ours? Participation in voting is low; our knowledge of history is minimal at best; and we, for the most part, do not “keep abreast” of current events (and don’t care to, for that matter), preferring to leave the responsibilities of our democracy “to the other guy”. To make matters worse, in my opinion, we tend to “fall back” on political parties, relying on preconceived opinions and obsolete knowledge as to just what and whom the party represents—often unknowingly voting against one’s own interests (If you think either the Republican or the Democratic Party are the same today as they were just a few years back, you have another think coming and better take another look. “I’ve always been a Democrat” or “my mother was a Republican” just doesn’t get it anymore). And what is happening as a result? We the people are losing our sovereignty. Through big money, dark money, lobbyists, etc. the Corporatocracy and Power Elite are running our government; and, except for the ballot box, we the people are substantively ignored. Now, even the Russians are affecting our elections—a long way from 1776, don’t you think?   

It’s time, don’t you think, to get off our lazy asses and take back our sovereignty. Perhaps we should look that word up in the dictionary as we seem to have lost sight of its meaning.

Ronald Miller








Wednesday, March 20, 2019

Does Social Security Add To The National Deficit Of The U.S. Budget?

The answer to this question is, “Absolutely not—NO!”. Our nation’s Social Security is self funded by employee and employer payroll contributions. From the very beginning in 1935, the fund has collected a surplus in excess of $2.5 Trillion which is invested in interest bearing U.S. Government securities held in the Federal Building on Avery Street in downtown Parkersburg, West Virginia. Don’t believe what some of the politicians and propagandists tell you and would have you believe to the contrary. They are either ignorant of the facts or downright liars.

Also, contrary to what some of these politicians and partisan Think Tanks tell you, our (your) Social Security Fund is currently rated as one of the most well managed institutions in government with an administrative cost of (I think this is close) around 2%, it’s solvent, and expected to remain so for the next ten years (I’m not really sure we can say that much for the rest of our government). You will hear all kinds of politically partisan gobbledygook to the contrary; but, at the present, you can take this to the bank. I’m sure my information is accurate, and I wouldn’t tell you this if I didn’t believe it.

But I must also tell you. The only sure thing in life is change (no one knows this better than you). Tomorrow isn’t today. Up until the past two or three years, payroll deductions paid into the S.S fund have exceeded payments of benefits from the fund (thus the surplus of $2.5 Trillion). Now this is in reverse. We are paying out more benefits than we are “taking in”, thus reducing the surplus. People are living longer; the “baby boom” generation is retiring, etc. This will continue until our surplus is spent (insolvent) or our Congress creates the necessary adjustments to the S.S. law to correct the imbalance, saving our system (I think the last time this was done was under President Reagan in 1981). In my opinion, this is one of the easiest and simplest problems to solve before our elected representatives today. Surely they recognize the importance of this program to the people and the continuing security of our country. I can't comprehend why they haven't done it.

I have shown you that our Social Security program is not part of the federal budget, is a stand-alone self funded program and, therefore, does not affect the national deficit, a fact supported by a declaration in 1990 by Congress to that effect. To the same end, I ask that you keep in mind when, in the future, our nation adopts a program of healthcare for all, that you insist of your elected representatives that that system also be completely self funded with zero over runs each year, therefore also not having any effect on budget deficits. Presently, payroll deductions notwithstanding, some Medicare costs affect the deficit. When we are able to achieve this, we will find that a self funded program of healthcare for all will greatly contribute toward the reduction of our national deficit and, in the end our national debt.

Until the next time,

Ronald Miller












Monday, March 18, 2019

Taxes


We need to understand something and understand it well. Any and every nation in existence today, including ours, needs a government to manage and conduct its affairs, whether it is a democracy, a dictatorship, or whatever. That’s an indisputable fact. Anarchy is unacceptable. The only question is how much we need and are willing to pay.

Something else—I’m sick and tired of hearing some of these politicians talk about free this and free that, i.e. healthcare, education, etc. !@.#*. Nothing, absolutely nothing is free! Somebody always has to pay for it; and, whether it’s through your taxes and government or straight out of your pocket, that somebody is you. If you are not paying taxes, someone else is paying for you. One might say that taxes paid by corporations are not yours, but don’t kid yourself. Taxes paid by corporations whenever possible are passed on to you through the prices you pay for their products or services. Taxes are your money (and responsibility), going and coming, right along with the money the government borrows, i.e. your national debt; and, (don’t forget this) “taxes buy civilization”—they are our responsibility.

In the final analysis, this all comes down to the fact that government is the responsibility of all of us, “we the people”; and we must pay for it—you and I.

Ronald Miller

Monday, January 21, 2019

The Current Shutdown of Our Government


Whatever political party yours may be; whatever opinions you might have about the current shutdown of our government and any and all relative matters pertaining to the subject, including yours and my views concerning these matters notwithstanding, this shutdown is an abomination to our country and our people for which there is no excuse—absolutely none!

Defined in a slightly different manner, it is a comprehensive dereliction of duty by our government as a whole beginning with the failure of our Senate (there is a bill in the Senate currently approved by the House of Representatives, currently on hold by the Senate Majority Leader) to bring to the floor for a vote and subsequently forwarded to the president for his approval or rejection under the rules of The Constitution of The United States of America (I’m confident I don’t need to remind you. If rejected by the president, the bill will be returned to the Senate for a final vote—override or defeat). And why is this bill on hold? The answer is plain and simple, politics. For that reason and that reason only, our people are suffering, a suffering that is growing more and more by the hour (a real crises), while our democracy and our nation are becoming the laughing stock of the world. We must resolve this crises and resolve it now!

When our government is operational once again, we must immediately generate and pass legislation preventing this from ever happening again.

There is nothing written in our constitution which permits our legislative and executive bodies to hold government employees hostage as pawns in negotiations with one another. I am certain we have experts in accounting and the law who can make this happen. If the crooks in our financial world, can run a business in “off balance sheet accounting”, surely our government can find a way to allow our government to “stay afloat” during our budgetary negotiations.


Enough is enough! Let’s “gitter done”!

Ronald Miller



Monday, September 24, 2018

Political Parties


Just an observation: George Washington, our first president, from the beginning of our nation advised against political parties. Sadly, his wishes weren’t respected.

It seems to me that there are two approaches to politics and voting in a democracy, or democratic republic if you will. One is voting decisions based upon issues. The other is voting decisions based upon parties.

If issues are the basis of voting, the voter is forced to be informed and educated on the issues in order to decide his vote. He must comprehend the issue, its impact, and the effect of his vote in order to vote intelligently.

If, on the other hand, political parties are the basis of voting, the only effort involved for the voter is a simple opinion of the candidate for office and the party he represents in his candidacy. Not only is this latter option much less complicated and easier for the voter, it renders him more controllable by the party leaders. The “My grandfather was a Whig, my father was a Whig; and, by gum and by golly, I’m a Whig” phenomenon comes into effect, and the rest becomes the order of the day—that party goals and aspirations change over times notwithstanding. Of course, how the candidate parts his hair, his looks, his personality, etc. certainly helps. It may even speed up the process. I might note, however, that under this latter option, our nation could possibly lose our democracy in the process. What we don’t know can hurt us.

These are my thoughts.

Ronald Miller