An Observation of Our
President and His Governance
In as much as our esteemed president likes to communicate in
the vernacular, “telling it like it is”, please allow me to communicate with
you in like manner.
In recent news, President Donald Trump complains, along with
many of his supporters, about his unfair treatment by critics to which I am
compelled to respond, Absurd! He brought almost all, if not every bit, of his
problems upon himself, beginning with his having run for election in the first
place. The office of President of The United States of America is one of the
highest and most complex managerial positions in the whole world; and Donald
Trump is not qualified in any way or manner. He cannot lead—he dictates. He does
not inspire and motivate people to loyally follow. He cannot manage—he does not
plan and “shoots from the hip”, constantly changing his position on issues
based upon his emotions at the time. His intelligence quotient notwithstanding,
he lacks knowledge, reportedly managing from a data base of the news media and
hearsay. Donald Trump is simply not qualified for the office of President of
The United States of America. Every day he is in office is testimony to this
fact, and that is just the way it is.
The threat of nuclear war notwithstanding, the greatest issue
before our president today is the division of our people. Rather than unite us
as a people (or even attempt such), he further divides us. Just one prime
example of this was his executive order about which I have written before—his
executive order to ban Muslims from entering this country from six specified
nations for ninety days—to what end? What could he do in ninety days under the
ban that he couldn’t do without his edict? Also, none of the nations indicated
have previously caused terror problems before. What in heaven’s name did this
man accomplish? Let me tell you. He divided us even further. He created havoc
and even more dissension among our people. He created nothing; and wasted
millions of taxpayer dollars in legal fees and arguing and bickering in the
process.
The second greatest threat to our very democracy and
sovereignty is our increasing dominance by the Corporatocracy and Power Elite. Corporate
dominance has been going on for a long time. If this is what the people want,
they should be allowed to vote on it. This is not what I want, and I don’t
think this is what you want. We the people should be allowed to have a say in
this matter; and to my knowledge, even our elected representatives have not had
a say in the matter. I tell you, Corporations are not people. They were
designed by man to serve the needs of man. They are not people, and “We” did
not create them to rule over us. Donald Trump has done nothing to address this
problem. Rather, he has exacerbated it.
The third greatest threat to our nation is the problem of
healthcare. Healthcare costs have grown so high, they are unaffordable by an
increasing segment of our society. In addition, from the beginning, they have
been underfunded, contributing significantly to our national deficit. There is
a simple, workable, and financially viable proven solution to the problem of
healthcare with a relatively minimum of amount of complexity and confusion—Universal
Single Payer, Medicare for all. Yes, we will have to pay for it. Nothing is
free; but, it will serve us well and cost a lot less than what we are now
paying with the present arguing, bickering, complexity, and inefficiency of
what we are now doing. Incorporated in our present Medicare system, this is the
fastest and easiest way for us to go. Under President Trump’s leadership, we
are going nowhere.
Fourth, and very important, Social Security has been
underfunded for too many years; and it is past time for our Congress to do
their job and catch up. Rather than spin their wheels by continually kicking
the ball down the road and/or postponing eligibility, i.e. extending age
requirements (You haven’t heard, have you, of any company extending age
requirements in hiring). Hear again, under the leadership of President Trump,
we are going nowhere.
So, for now, I’ll close by reminding you that our country is
in deep trouble. We need to go in a different direction and that direction
needs to be towards serving the people of our great nation, all of them—Not
Just Donald Trump and the One Percent and certainly not the Corporatocracy.
In the meantime, this
is Ronald Miller
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI am certain that we agree on almost everything and so would most Americans but perspective and interpretation is what gives the illusion of division.
ReplyDeleteI think that there is not a real nuclear threat because people who rule this planet from the shadows are not going to ruin the place they live in. If they want chaos they will shut down the grid for some time and let us sort out our differences.
What is going on in Washington and with the media is a deliberate effort to deprive the Trump administration from governing and reverse the globalist agenda. As you state truly our nation faces many problems none of which are being address. Nor that they were in the previous administration of the one before. All that is being done is kick the can down the road until the Bankers decide to write off the debt the world is carrying.
I am inclined to believe that Donald Trump is the bankruptcy president but many in the Deep State are not ready concede and want to keep it going longer.
There are people on this planet trying to find the way to solve the problem. I think that in fairness to the Democratic process the elected president deserves be given the opportunity to change policy and try to make it work. Certainly the policies we had before have ruined us and they were nothing to brag about.
This infighting is paralyzing government more than it already was. If we don't have Trump we will have Pence and the American people did not vote for him. As you know I voted for Trump to vote against Hillary but certainly would have not voted for Pence. Will those who voted against Trump be happy to have Pence as their president? I certainly wouldn’t.
So in summary instead of having half of the people happy and half unhappy why not make everyone unhappy? :-)
I wrote the comment above to share my views but could have summarized it with one sentence.
ReplyDelete"Misery loves company." :-)